Aperiodic Polycube Tiling(s).

In a sense the 3D chair tiles may be viewed as hepta-cube tiles. Here we we will demonstrate similar aperiodic substitution tiling based on two types of poly-cubes, the tri-cube and tetra-cube shown in figure 1.

For a multiplication factor of 2, the first substitution tiles contain 24 and 32 small cubes respectively. The bottom and top face of the tricube are identical to the 2D chair tile. Therefore, a trivial tri-cube substitution tile consists of two layers of four tri-cube prototiles. Also a trivial tetra-cube supertile can be built from 8 tetra-cube prototiles by combining two of them to a basic cube. Therefore, we demand that the substitution tiles are built from a finite number of both types of prototiles, infact we choose the numbers are four and three respectively for the super-tri-cube, and four and five for the super-tetra-cube. There are still a number of different ways to construct the supertiles. Our choise is to make them as symmetrical as possible as shown in figure 1.

Fig.1 The proposed substitution rule for the tri-and tetra-cube tiles.

To force these supertiles to have the appearance shown in fig. 1, we distinguish two different tri-cubes and three different tetra-cubes by adding pegs and slots to some of their edges in the way shown in fig. 2.

Fig. 2. By adding two different types of pegs fitting into corresponding slots to two tri- and three tetra-cubes as shown in the figure, the placement of the tiles is forced to deliver the configuration chosen in fig. 1.

The resulting tiling has a bottom face, which is identical to the 2D chair tiling, as is shown on the right hand side of fig. 3. Some of the faces parallel and perpendicular the bottom face are periodic and others are not.